When the polemic began on large dams, the World Bank changed its infrastructural policy, refusing to launch other projects. Today, it recognizes this was an error. She renewed its estimation of the benefits from large dams and completely changed its strategy. For the Bank, if you want that the countries suffering from chronicle water scarcity get a minimum of water reserves to resist drought periods, it’s imperative to go back to those projects. On the condition, of course, that we take into account and we solve the social, human and environmental problems associated with them. Today, happily, we made big progresses on those points.
But there are still very strong tensions around the Three Gorges Dam…
Of course, there are always tensions around constructions like that. But once again, you need to keep in mind this colossal dissymmetry between the developing countries that need to store water to compensate for the hazards of climate, and the developed countries, where that need is less strong. That’s an injustice for which the countries from the South are reproaching us more and more and that we can no longer tolerate.
Is there any alternative to large dams? In Western Africa, for example, we try to manage small reservoirs, more upstream, to delocalize water storage. Another possibility is underground storage rather than surface storage. That’s not always possible but if so, it is an interesting alternative. (Original Source : ICOLD Official Site, Photo Source : upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/ThreeGorgesDam-China2009.jpg)

